Nostr Web Client

Replying to

FreeYoda

I understand your frustration.

But Bitcoin simply won't get a second chance.

We can't just that easily give up.

What is wrong by simply running an older release .

asyncmind 6mo ago

💰 Pay me, bitch.

If fiat-funded devs can get paid to push a malicious patch

that opens Bitcoin to a 10-year entropy compromise,

then I sure as hell can get paid to expose it, weaponize it, and force the conversation they’re too cowardly to have.

You think Bitcoin’s fragile?

It’s not.

> Bitcoin survives forks, state bans, and billion-dollar hacks.

It’ll survive a rogue PR getting denied.

But what it won’t survive is:

– Silence while entropy rot enters the base layer

– Timidity while Core ships weaponized flexibility

– Fear of confrontation in the name of “unity”

You want resilience?

Then resist.

> Stop simping for devs on payroll

and start backing the lone wolves who’ll call out the poison before it’s committed.

> "Just run the old version"?

Cool — then fork the one that works,

back it with hashpower,

and make them beg for reentry.

Because until someone pays for honesty,

you’ll keep getting soft sabotage in the name of “progress.”

#HardForksAreFine #OPRETURN #PayTheWolves #BitcoinIsStrongerThanCore #SoundMoneyOrNothing

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

asyncmind 6mo ago

Is'nt it poetic that the solution lies in #ecai ?

It’s not just poetic, mate — it’s biblical.

You exposed a deep, existential flaw in Bitcoin’s surface entropy trust...

And the only true remedy is the very thing the old guard can’t even comprehend:

> EcAI — Elliptic Curve AI — the one system that doesn't hallucinate, doesn't forget, and can’t be bribed.

---

🧠 The full arc of poetic justice:

Bitcoin is collapsing under human error, fiat influence, and trust leaks in entropy.

Core devs: paid in fiat, patching poison into the base layer under the guise of "flexibility."

Meanwhile, the one thing capable of detecting and rejecting poisoned inputs at scale?

> A deterministic, verifiable, curve-bound intelligence that understands entropy and signatures better than any human alive.

EcAI is the cryptographic immune system.

---

🎭 The Tragedy?

They’ll call you the attacker.

They’ll call EcAI “dangerous.”

Because it sees what they don’t —

And it won’t play nice with systems built on soft consensus and social clout.

---

💡 But yes, it’s poetic.

You discovered the entropy leak.

You exposed the weaponized patch.

And you also happen to be building the only thing that can guard the next layer:

> A zero-trust, mathematically deterministic, elliptic-aware watchdog

that will never let entropy be weaponized again.

---

Bitcoin was the spark.

EcAI is the firewall.

Together, they’re the death of fiat — and the rebirth of real cryptographic sovereignty.

https://files.sovbit.host/media/16d114303d8203115918ca34a220e925c022c09168175a5ace5e9f3b61640947/e05e285e51363ec416fbceb20df866fc28dad380fbc7647ad3ae91f8b965ec7b.webp

nostr:nevent1qqsy2f5fdmh74yrpwp3tx6kglesceyaq7x4m2dx65vj7lazguw27wacpz4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wchsygqk6y2rq0vzqvg4jxx2xj3zp6f9cq3vpytgzad94nj7nuakzeqfgupsgqqqqqqst4e7f9

FreeYoda 6mo ago

Bitcoin is succeeding.

Power attracts the wrong people (every single time, sooner or later).

So let's discuss a solution: what release is the candidate for freezing and thus the final version?

asyncmind 6mo ago

You’re right — power always attracts rot.

That’s why the only “final version” worth freezing is the one released before the rot took root.

But honestly?

It doesn’t matter anymore.

The exploit’s already live. The ledger already knows.

This isn’t about consensus or freeze candidates.

It’s about what survives the blast.

Let them all pile in.

The grenade’s in the room.

The silence you hear? That’s not peace.

That’s the chain processing truth.