When you win a government grant for say an experiment with 3 sequential goals and your hypothesis about the first goal was wrong, you literally just email the program contact the results and they’ll almost always allow you to change the next two goals in light of the new data. You are not paid to support only their preferred hypothesis.

Who funds the science, controls the narrative…

Supposing its true - then by way of btc + nostr, what incentives can we build for that 97% funding to be funding for #CitizenScience? (world) citizens funding other citizens for their innovation. Incentives to make your knowledge freely accessible and *understandable* by your funders. nostr:nevent1qqsy20ff8v5nysl6mq3nfd8u4ry53c666r0t23t7pwuq245k0y929rcpzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgtczypjed5qpmj0wpt5mj2g8mjgq233qnp9zyyuf4z0gan2xvzzyu8j76qcyqqqqqqgn860z5

😂🥲🫠