I think its fairly obvious from Liquid’s transaction volume that it has failed from an adoption perspective.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

That's your Opinion.

Bullbitcoin likes them, and they have an important and useful product for their users.

I happen to think miniature scale replicas are a silly hobby. I think second life is a waste of time. The consumers of those disagree.

Bitcoin doesn’t need to cater for for other peoples use case. The two aren’t mutually exclusive.

that's exactly what a soft fork is for

What is segwit and taproot if not a new use case ?

It's like saying u.s dollars cannot be used to buy miniatures via credit card because i don't think there is a sufficient market for them.

Also, the bip300 soft fork is not catering to anyone who does not want to participate in sidechains. It does nothing to you excecpt increase your security.

Also, since some of your objections and understanding of the topic are falling through, i recommend you consider the FAQ and years of research on the topic, based on your name.

Drivechain is insurance against a black swan event that is negative for bitcoin.

There are no black swans that drivechains provide a solution for 😂

Almost all of them actually. Something like an alien civilization giving us each infitite power and matter creation, maybe not. The difficulty would probably just increase though.

Your lack of understanding about bip300 is not evidence against drivechains.