He presents a very different point of view. And that's coming from having a "lense" of a soldier.

If what he says is true (and it probably is, I just don't have enough knowledge about war) - then Bitcoin shouldn't be even discussed with the SEC or whoever is responsible for the monetary system.

It has to be discussed at the security/defense level.

As he said, that would completely overcome all the resistance to adopting BTC and it would be adopted in a completely different way than we, regular plebs, thought it would be.

Saylor also has a similar point of view and he also served in the army. These guys understand something more than us regular plebs don't.