If you can migrate that means people won't know where you are, so they can't expect your stuff to be in the same server as everybody else, then they have to connect to multiple serves to fetch your stuff and now we are in the Nostr territory.
Interesting.
But signed plus movable data don't actually equal decentralized? Relays are the natural outcome.
If I'm not wrong, some time ago nostr:npub180cvv07tjdrrgpa0j7j7tmnyl2yr6yr7l8j4s3evf6u64th6gkwsyjh6w6 talked about this.
Discussion
Yes.
Just before this note I was talking with Blowater via DM about private groups, so my comment was influenced by that thought. In this case maybe we can expect to be on the same server, and move on if something goes wrong.
Just (re)read your updated NIP-29, it's what I was thinking about. In fact I was also speculating if/how private groups controlled by a relay can be forked.
Everybody will have to agree together to move on if something goes wrong? You mean like everybody on Twitter have agreed to move on to Gab when every single person in the planet realized that banning Alex Jones was the sign of something going wrong?
I got what you say, on the global(s) space(s) it's obvious, Nostr solves this.
But in private groups we are bound to the group owner/admin, so it is enough for him to decide. Others follow or fork, like your NIP-29 seems to suggest, right?
What part of the internet infrastructure enables routing so you can find people's server? And can we make that more sovereign and easier to provision?