Enabling cryptocurrency by regulation is literally: "for something that before the regulation anyone could have done, you now need a special permit (license) and comply with regulatory bullshit".
Oh, but regulatory clarity!
What is not clear in "everything that is not forbidden is allowed"? What more regulatory clarity do you need?
Stop with this enabling statetalk, we don't need to enable anything, we are pre-enabled by default.
These authoritarians also talk about problems that come from a lack of regulation, but I've never been able to get them to name a single one where the lack of regulation is in writing rather than enforcement, and yet they try to use this argument to justify writing new regulations, instead of examining why existing ones aren't enforced.
True facts.
The worst thing is, they are in a very twisted way right.
The legacy codebase of the Law is so complicated and entangled that in many cases, you actually "need" a new regulation to enable something or make something which was unclear a bit more clearer.
What a twisted world we have. State created a shit show of bad laws, and now instead of removing them, they are constantly patching them. And as with any legacy codebase, you patch one bug and create ten new issues...
They are called features, not bugs
