Replying to Avatar ManiMe

Sovereign Webs of Trust…

Curious?

*Read this article for my short take.*

https://yakihonne.com/article/naddr1qqgx2e3cxqenqef3x56kvd3nxymxzq3qmanlnflyzyjhgh970t8mmngrdytcp3jrmaa66u846ggg7t20cgqqxpqqqp65w7jk7e3

*Comment bellow to offer your own.*

1. What does Sovereign WoT mean to you?

2. Does it require “is trusted” (for a followed account) to be explicitly set by the user, or could “is trusted” be ONLY calculated by algos and still count as sovereign?

3. If explicit is required, can “is trusted” simply be a “follows” (kind3) list, or does it actually need a dedicated ( private event kind) “trusted” list?

4. Would (your) Sovereign WoT require that content filters follow users across clients, and be sharable by them?

5. Should these filters (for end users) be publishable ONLY by clients or ONLY by relays or ONLY by DVMs or ANY and ALL of these?

Listening in on the CornyChat for Sovereign WoT now. I'm unable to load this article. Yakihonne says "article not found" for me. Having trouble with my relays.

Check out

https://pgf.tech/

by nostr:npub1u5njm6g5h5cpw4wy8xugu62e5s7f6fnysv0sj0z3a8rengt2zqhsxrldq3

https://github.com/wds4/pretty-good

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Thanks. I’ll read shortly. Sorry to miss you on corny chat. Wd love to hear your thoughts on the Sovereign part of WoT.

Here’s a nostr link to the article. Hope that works better.

nostr:note1437m6fpdcwxurnufzwzj4ztylqw66slug5teza7xllm4slnsamescpftp5