Fiatjaf has talked about DID being OTT in the past. DID guys have argued it’s naive to not have all the protections that come with these open standard frameworks. So I would like to think that as the most popular use cases of these keys becomes apparent (pubkey vs DID)then the maturity of the key infrastructure is better and it’s more obvious to merge / migrate to the winner.
Discussion
Implement DID can permit to some participants to chose a method provided by Ethereum like the case of NIP-05 trough "ethnostr.com" using "MetaMask", spitting on "sovrin" method defined by (Augmented Backus-Naur Form).. Simply because “w3c” has knowingly declared war on the Bitcoin protocol & hopes to compromise the future scope that “Internet” can have by imposing “specifications” that will benefit other crypto-ecosystems that will have to bend under their requirements. This would be an imposture & a betrayal on the part of the “Nostr” devs towards the proto-ecosystem.
w3c’s recommendations have been widely adopted by governments & regulatory bodies worldwide..
Don’t remplace the Web with "insanity".. Why no Bitcoin integrations into Browsers ??