With this news, I’m almost thinking about selling my Bitcoin 2023 Conference ticket. I’ve already finalized a lot of my plans to go, so it’d be a huge disruption to me deciding. Certainly, if they keep going down this path, I certainly won’t be going to the next conference.

In my opinion, Bitcoin Mag *should* be the guiding light to encourage the global MONETARY adoption, not monke jpegs. I’m not going through shitcoin decontamination just to see it all wind up on #Bitcoin. It’s like BM‘s history with VB as one of the founders is still relevant to today’s current company. With all the shit talking they’ve done about shitcoin No. 1, you’d think they’d be able to look in the mirror and see this.

The ones encouraging Ords/Ins keep saying “if the protocol permits it, too bad” and that’s not what I’m arguing against. I’m arguing that you should have some moral decency to not clog the network and increase fees for blatantly unnecessary garbage. Some things could (maybe) go on the chain, but they should be relevant, useful, free (because you can’t *own* a fucking inscription, scammers), lightweight, and possibly aid in sovereignty/freedom; at the very least, be clever. This is not an extensive list of qualifications, just my ramblings.

CC: #[3]​ #[1]​

#gorillawarfare