Custodians services are not bad.
Being obligated to use custodians is bad.
Not having alternative to custodians is bad.
A lot of fiat jurisdictions obligate you to pay or save only with "verified tracked method".
Fiat is bad.
Discussion
Even a nobrainer understands that put money in the hands of a custodian is bad when with bitcoin you can become easily sovrein of your wealth.
But is that bad CHOOSE to put a little amount of money in a wallet of satoshi, without give ID, and consciously assiming all the risks of the case?
I think custodians are services, and market will tell us if custodian services are bad or good.
But bitcoin revolution is also about having "better custodians", not only "destroy all custodians".
What do you think?
#coffechain #plebchain #gm #gn