you can say whatever you want about kirk and pageants and "teams" and corporate remote workers.... in the end: they're all ideology cults. just because you agree with or have been gang banged into one of these cult pools - does not mean they are not cults. the kirks for example, were part of an aryan pageant cult - one which religiously genuflects to maga trump leadership. it's a cult. it's not a political party.
sort of like how nazis we're a cult. or the kkk.
same thing.
i believe it is common for cultists to be offended and rabidly defend the cult ideology.
sort of how they do things. 😏
📇⬇️ policy:
what an opportunity.... 😏🥃🚬
https://leparisien.fr/paris-75/emmanuel-macron-inaugurera-vendredi-les-tours-de-notre-dame-rouvertes-apres-lincendie-17-09-2025-LON5ZJPNLJAVJFQASKLK2LJNIM.php?xtor=AD-366 Emmanuel Macron inaugurera vendredi les tours de Notre-Dame, rouvertes après l’incendie via @le_Parisien
incredible that was the line of demarcation for propriety regarding kimmel.... fucking scumbag.
imagine defending colbert and kimmel but being against the "deep state" and harris. lmao no one can decide what they are mad at.... william
morris has everyone twisting in their seats. colbert is a creep just like kimmel. and the kirks are a rival cult of a different vein of scumbags but they are all human traffickers. so.
🪜⬇️ lore:
one of the critical theory theses i have always used (my thesis) when teaching jane eyre and wife sargasso sea is they are mirrors of one another with regards so social norms. wide sargasso sea, when viewed through the social lens of gender and ability, as become the strange child describing the abled masculine as bertha - the woman hostage to a colonial misunderstanding. when you contrast the historical voices of brontë and rhys - this sort of fascinating social commentary does help unpack and relate the darker shadow truths of our revisionist perspectives on culture. down to english versus american. this thesis presents a sort of cyclical conversation which challenges both historical shadow norms and current ones - and presents an opportunity to use critical theory as a tool for exploring how the historical lens of critical theory in literature gives us new eyes and new depth to old classic texts.... including the ability to challenge those texts with new voice and perspective.
every single video is a man or a man talking about a woman - with some sort of agendized packet discussing gaza ukraine or scandinavia, attached to it in the "next".... and when i searched content on morrison, a box popped up which suggested i search for the topic "revisionist history". is where we are headed tomorrow.
