Bye
#[0]
An embarrassment today too.
In bed with Snowden, a baiting scum ops of a “treasonous deflector” working for Russians
Well, at least that’s a compliment to be rejected by.
Bye
#[0]
An embarrassment today too.
In bed with Snowden, a baiting scum ops of a “treasonous deflector” working for Russians
Well, at least that’s a compliment to be rejected by.
🫂
Damn… they need to meditate 🧘♀️ take a walk and breath.
Roya gets it👆
But question is do we understand temporal causality, or better yet, the effects of false cored temporal causality.
Not a personal opinion whether the marketing teams carelessness of making a marketing statement which kinda feeds the false cores of fake social engineering, is it?
How to make good when the persona in question is a Russian deflected traitor?
How does that serve the people’s interests or feeling that their presence is not being violated by overreaching government bodies?
Hi Jack.
Curious about the marketing strategy where the discrepancy in story telling as a product does bring questions, since either the marketing strategy is flawed to have Eddie, a Russian deflector traitor, according to the legend is all of a sudden an American entrepreneur, or that the cahoots with government bodies having been caught stealing is a suitable bed partner.
Now, there is no judgment to the observation, but the causality does suggest a false cored implosion to be probable since although people are gullible, false cored temporal causalities implode.
J DILLA 🙌
THAT GAS 🔥🔥🔥🔥
Chambers?
🤭
Dealer Lindsey?
Some argue the temporal causality implosion does better being blown than the massacres and genocide which else would be done.
Got how fake news work yet, Pac-Man?
As I don’t really.
Not about me Roya to fee, but simple nature of causalities not to turn into casualties, but you don’t hear me though.
Russia was were he washed up after ya'll yanked his passport.
Yeah no, the persona storytelling conflict in question does make a poor bluff somehow when all in, and I’m afraid my understanding here does present a significant risk for conflict, hence my concern.
But you tell me how else to explain the marketing game.
Can’t be both serving people and not.
So how would Eddie being a Russian deflected traitor, as persona or not, make a good business partner even for marketing?
Who does that serve then? Since either in bed with a Russian deflected traitor as the persona is, or in bed with an overreaching tyrannical government which in turn does conflict with the idea of decentralized democracy?!