Nostr Web Client

But then they move on to other countries in the middle east. In the words of George Orwell: "The war is not meant to be won, it is meant to be continuous".

And even if the war ends, what makes you think that the foreign aid to Israel ends?

Dissident Sound 6mo ago 💬 1

Israel is very close to total control over Middle East

if US goes all in on the side of Israel the Arabs will be completely finished within a year

we been supporting Israel for 80 years and at this point it would be cheaper for us to finish the job than to continue putting it off

sure the Jews will continue to steal but the point is you should either do something or not do it - and if you are going to do it you should aim to finish the job quickly

what most on the right advocate is simply doing the job slower and worse. they don't advocate allowing Israel to be destroyed - they simply argue that "well Iran is not really close to a nuke so let's wait some more" - for what ? what will that accomplish ? how does waiting to act benefit us ?

if you were to say let's nuke Israel i would be 100% on board. nuke them and gas every single kike. but that's not on the table.

if we're going to protect Israel anyway then if we want to spend the least time and money doing so we should finish their last remaining enemy IMMEDIATELY AND WITHOUT DELAY.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Prince Aleph 6mo ago 💬 2

As I said I'm not sure why they waited so long to do this when the plans have been drawn up for a long time, but I also think even from a realpolitik standpoint the US would want to be involved over there, even if Israel did not exist.

Because, US economy is still dependent on oil, and they still have a majority of the best remaining supplies over there, not to mention US corporations have decades of investment in that sphere at this point and are not interested in having that all go down the drain.

The USA became a big producer thanks to fracking but my understanding of that is there's uncertainty of how long the US supplies will hold up, since most of it is coming from Texas these days and the rest of the US supplies are declining.

That's why I don't think it's as simple as "just a war for Israel" but that's certainly a part of it. Also from the Israeli perspective it's an opportunity for a land grab and they need it at this point.

The wild cards are:

1. Many Israelis are getting sick of their own country/regime and leaving (over 75K in past year I believe) and going to various Western countries. One friend from high school was half-Jewish and he ended up living over there. He was among those that left years ago - when I asked him why he said "that place is crazy" and "I have no intention of ever going back". He lives in UK now. Not an uncommon story.

2. Of the Israelis that are staying, the biggest growth population is the haredi who are basically welfare bums. The Israelis themselves are perplexed on how to deal with this.

Dissident Sound 6mo ago 💬 1

we do not need oil. only 3rd world countries need oil.

1st world countries have everything we need in the form of Nuclear Power and Electric Cars.

yes this car:

gets about 12 mpg, but this one:

gets over 100 mpg if charged overnight.

driving a heavy duty V8 pickup truck is a CHOICE it is not a NEED for 99% of people.

i haven't seen a single such truck in NYC in 20 years of living there and somehow people survived. also somehow people survive without them in every nation outside US because such trucks aren't sold outside US.

anybody who can afford a heavy duty truck can afford a Prius Prime, but they prefer to bitch about how gas is too expensive instead.

the only legitimate use for oil is air travel but 90% of air travel in US is unnecessary. almost all of it can be replaced by teleconferencing, and most of the the rest could be replaced with high speed rail.

electric rail from NY only reaches to DC and then you have to switch to Diesel to keep going further south. this is in 2025 ! they still haven't electrified the rail south of DC because Niggers. modern high speed rail in US only exists here in New Jersey pretty much. if it extended to Miami it would be a 8 hour ride from NY to Miami with ZERO oil used. you could just take a nap and wake up in Miami.

you would still need a plane to go from NY to LA or London but few people NEED to take such trips.

we DO NOT NEED OIL.

the wars were 100% for Israel.

🥚 6mo ago 💬 2

If you live in a rural area and you don't have 4w drive and / or a nice truck then moving around can get complicated. I'm sure NYC. Gets completely plowed very quickly and if it doesn't you can always take the subway. If you live in Nowhere, SD (pop. 257) if you don't have a proper car you'd be stuck in your house for weeks.

Dissident Sound 6mo ago

actually New Jersey suburbs get plowed continuously 24/7 before the snow can even accumulate but NYC gets buried in snow but we don't care because NYC is for Niggers anyway

a very small percentage of people actually need to live in remote areas that require trucks. for most truck owners it's a lifestyle CHOICE not a need.

for example one of my bosses when i worked in Manhattan had a Truck - obviously he didn't live in Manhattan - nor did he commute to work in the truck. he just used the truck to enlarge his genitals which he didn't even need because he was like 6'8" tall and was married to a professional dancer.

🥚 6mo ago

I agree that most people don't need trucks and they just get them because they are insecure.

Prince Aleph 6mo ago 💬 1

You kind of prove the point though - we still use 7.3 billion barrels of oil per year or whatever it is because we haven't built the high speed rail. This isn't China and we prefer to spend money on welfare rather than infrastructure. Mind you the US does have an extensive and advanced rail system but it's mostly used for freight.

Again you are right that dependence on oil is a problem with a solution but it's in nobody's interest to solve that problem right now. There have been some baby steps toward infrastructure investment in recent years like building more chip factories in the USA (since Covid) but that is likely because they see us as being in a war with China eventually, and it became a national security issue.

Dissident Sound 6mo ago 💬 1

ugh ...

imagine this semi-hypothetical scenario. a young virgin boy joins the football team, he trains hard, his coach gives him some steroids and he ends up looking pretty good - he has a crush on a hot cheerleader and to his amazement she lets him hit it in every hole. he feels like he has died and gone to heaven, that he has found his future wife etc. then she just proceeds to fuck every other player on the team including the niggers.

imagine meeting this boy in that period of time while he is obliviously banging that cheerleader and trying to explain to him that she is not an angel descended from heaven and is just a slut and that his feelings for her are ridiculous and that in 30 years he himself will laugh at how dumb he was.

you can't explain that to him because some things can only be understood when you have perspective. likewise nostr:npub1acg6thl5psv62405rljzkj8spesceyfz2c32udakc2ak0dmvfeyse9p35c thinks if he has high IQ he can just go on Jew Tube to watch some videos by "experts" or read some studies and figure something out. WRONG. you need PERSPECTIVE to figure things out.

you pretty much have to understand how the entire world works before you can understand why any part of it is the way it is. this is why only i can figure things out. ( well and Netanyahu and Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates ). the tragedy of nostr:npub1acg6thl5psv62405rljzkj8spesceyfz2c32udakc2ak0dmvfeyse9p35c is that his success as a NOSTR developer went to his head, his ego got too big and ultimately blocked his ability to continue to learn. the price he will pay for this is death, but he wouldn't be the first man to be destroyed by his ego. just look what happened to Elon Musk recently - compared to that nostr:npub1acg6thl5psv62405rljzkj8spesceyfz2c32udakc2ak0dmvfeyse9p35c is doing amazingly great.

anyway, there are several holes in your theory about Oil.

( continued in reply below )

Dissident Sound 6mo ago 💬 1

the biggest and most obvious problem in your theory is that it assumes that broke ass rednecks that drive rusted out trucks and can't afford gas control America.

they surely BELIEVE that they have power, which is why they fell for the January 6 trap - but in the process they quickly found out how much power they have - ZERO.

there is NO strength in numbers. all of the sheep on the farm have ZERO power versus a single shepherd. over a billion Muslims have zero power over a handful of Jews like Netanyahu. the notion that America would go to war for Oil is insane for many reasons but one of them is that nobody in power actually cares whether you can afford gas or not and people who can't afford gas have zero power.

( continued in reply below )

Dissident Sound 6mo ago

the other problem is equally big and obvious ...

we went to Iraq in 2003 ... in 2007 Al Gore got the Oscar for his 2006 movie "inconvenient truth" in which he predicted that by 2012 the ice caps would be gone, and in that same year ( 2007 ) Al Gore also got a Nobel Prize for his Climate bullshit.

now tell me - what sense does it make that the same JEWS who awarded Al Gore TWICE for his climate alarmism would start a war to pump oil ? and that they would do this while blocking our own oil production and canceling the oil pipeline from Canada ?

or maybe, just maybe the reason the Jews sent us to kill Saddam was this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1991_Iraqi_missile_attacks_against_Israel#:~:text=Throughout%20the%20entire%20Gulf%20War,January%20to%2023%20February%201991.

in the words of the great Milo Yiannopoulos SNAP THE FUCK OUT OF IT !

we DID NOT EVEN TAKE THE OIL when we took over iraq.

it was just a ruse to get Bush's voter base of DUMB REDNECKS to back the war. those guys with their Chevy trucks wanted that oil yes, and they were promised it yes, but they never got it. because they are not in charge - THE JEWS ARE.

GET IT ?