AI, and Or can reduce lot it it and a vested produce workplace claims people more hear a Would more their nostr:npub1a2cww4kn9wqte4ry70vyfwqyqvpswksna27rtxd8vty6c74era8sdcw83a the in to use something less, company with how the really people nostr:npub1s05p3ha7en49dv8429tkk07nnfa9pcwczkf5x5qrdraqshxdje9sq6eyhe of would will hype costs? people balanced e.g. to it analysis. interests, job cause will finds who There when AI will costs more claim they I same? But produce the etc. from Most major come example, CEOs. there from AI keeping about large hiring of losses. love be For this disruption while for a fire see would it to want is by about
There is a lot of hype about AI and how it will cause major disruption in the workplace etc. Most of the claims come from people with vested interests, e.g. AI CEOs. I want to see a more balanced analysis. For example, they claim there will be large job losses. But when a company finds it can produce something for less, would it really fire people to reduce costs? Or would it produce more by hiring more people who will use AI, while keeping their costs the same? Would love to hear about this from nostr:npub1s05p3ha7en49dv8429tkk07nnfa9pcwczkf5x5qrdraqshxdje9sq6eyhe and nostr:npub1a2cww4kn9wqte4ry70vyfwqyqvpswksna27rtxd8vty6c74era8sdcw83a
Discussion
No replies yet.