Replying to Avatar imp0stor

nostr:npub1excellx58e497gan6fcsdnseujkjm7ym5yp3m4rp0ud4j8ss39js2pn72a nostr:npub1lh273a4wpkup00stw8dzqjvvrqrfdrv2v3v4t8pynuezlfe5vjnsnaa9nk nostr:npub1wnlu28xrq9gv77dkevck6ws4euej4v568rlvn66gf2c428tdrptqq3n3wr nostr:npub1yxp7j36cfqws7yj0hkfu2mx25308u4zua6ud22zglxp98ayhh96s8c399s nostr:npub10vlhsqm4qar0g42p8g3plqyktmktd8hnprew45w638xzezgja95qapsp42 and others.

What about solving op_return with nested PoW? In this case all tx would be mini blocks, with difficulty scaled down from the network difficulty and then multiplied by the bytes in op_return. It should effectively scale the cost of larger arbitrary data in op_return by making miners have to choose if the fee is worth the PoW for the tx and scale the cost of larger blobs.

Updated version:

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzpcnfv8qm6a85kwqp4ste0qpgshdv097y8metpj2sctknvyf2j8ufqy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7qgkwaehxw309a3x2an09ehx7um5wgcjucm0d5hszymhwden5te0wp6hyurvv4cxzeewv4ej7qpqgtkqcp3aydqdruv8yj0w3krg3v2wrkpte2sgmfae8747x9h4g4esfpguks

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.