I do believe it was pretty clear that the intention was to call others to a higher level of behavior. A reflection. You seem much more interested in forming sides in a battle than you are in the conduct of the people you side with. That's not how a positive world is built.
Discussion
I'm interested in a just world and support the public condemnation of unjust things or people. You seem to be arguing that everyone is worthy of advocacy regardless of their agenda or position. Tolerance and "positivity" are not virtues, while justice is. I'd also urge you to consider why you would expect anyone to join your cause when it cripples the primary mechanism we have to maintain cultures online; specifically, group gatekeeping.
Justice is never issued by a mob.
Thank you for your comments.
That's simply historically false. However, if you believe it axiomatically then there's nothing I can say.
I am tired and do believe we’ve run this to an end, where I at least have nothing to add at the moment.
I do want to part by giving you gratitude for reading my article, and spending your time today to engage in a good faith debate on its contents. I am richer for having discussed this with you, and I promise I do dwell on and consider points when someone disagrees with me.
You have gained my respect today as a good faith conversationalist. Thank you very much ❤️