Maintainers

Project maintainers have commit access and are responsible for merging patches from contributors. They perform a janitorial role merging patches that the team agrees should be merged. They also act as a final check to ensure that patches are safe and in line with the project goals. The maintainers’ role is by agreement of project contributors.

With Van der Laan’s departure, Bitcoin’s development will now be steered by five people: Hennadii Stepanov, Michael Ford, Andrew Chow, Marko Falke, and Gloria Zhao.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

There are only more questions. I'm sorry, but I can't find a clear answer.

I wonder how these maintainers are chosen and how the process of accepting patches that the team considers necessary to merge goes?

And why did Wladimir J. van der Laan leave the bitcoin core?

According to my knowledge, Wladimir left due to personal health reasons. I also don't know how they are chosen, but I believe that the current maintainers choose the next ones, but I'm not sure. To learn more about the process of proposing changes, you can consult the Bitcoin Core GitHub.

https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin

👾🪬⚡️

It's some kind of bullshit. We should ask these five what is going on there? Or who else might know?

nostr:npub16mwf24pwrzut0tkz79rppa2uxddta0k8du7mnevvy4rxr5ze8gxq4w2myx What do you think?

Everyone is talking about the need to switch to nostr, but this post describes an even bigger problem..

You dug up this post from the depths of the internet. You deserve a gold shovel award for that.

I read the post and some of the comments, and I'm honestly not happy about the situation. It would be important to hear the other developers' side of the story to form a more informed opinion. For now, I'm just a bystander.