How easy would package management be with pure beam files?
#AskGPT #TheNewMobile #BeamLife #BeamApps #NewParadigms #NoCruft
Managing packages with pure BEAM files (compiled Erlang code) on a mobile device like the PinePhone can be quite manageable with the right tools and approaches, though it may differ significantly from traditional package management systems due to Erlang's unique environment.
1. OTP Releases and Hot Code Loading
Erlang's OTP (Open Telecom Platform) offers a powerful way to bundle applications and their dependencies into releases, which are essentially self-contained packages. OTP releases handle all the dependencies and can be deployed easily on any device, including a PinePhone, without needing complex package management systems like apt or pacman. Erlang’s hot code loading also allows you to update parts of the system without restarting the entire application, which could simplify updates on mobile devices.
Ease of Management: Once an OTP release is built, it is portable and easy to manage across different environments. This reduces the need for a package manager to handle individual dependencies.
2. Rebar3 and Hex Package Management
Erlang’s Rebar3 tool provides a standardized way to manage dependencies, compile projects, and build releases. Rebar3 works seamlessly with Hex, the package manager for Erlang and Elixir, which simplifies downloading and managing libraries. Hex and Rebar3 handle dependencies by fetching, compiling, and bundling them into the project, so developers don’t need to manually manage packages after initial setup.
Simplified Dependency Management: Using Rebar3, developers can define dependencies in a configuration file, and the tool takes care of fetching and compiling these packages, ensuring compatibility with the BEAM.
3. No Native Libraries
If your packages are pure BEAM files, without native code or C extensions, the package management becomes even simpler because you don't need to worry about compiling for different architectures (like ARM for the PinePhone). Pure BEAM files are architecture-independent as long as the Erlang runtime (BEAM) is installed.
Cross-Platform Portability: Pure BEAM files work on any platform where BEAM is installed, so package management becomes primarily about distributing these files.
4. No Conflicts with Other Package Managers
Since Erlang’s package management with BEAM files operates independently of the system package manager (like pacman for Arch Linux on the PinePhone), there are fewer potential conflicts. You don’t need to worry about system dependencies or package versions clashing with those needed by the operating system, since Erlang handles dependencies at the application level through OTP releases or Rebar3.
Decoupled Package Management: This separation between system-level package management and Erlang’s BEAM-level management avoids the common issues of dependency hell seen in some other languages.
5. Versioning and Isolation
Erlang supports multiple versions of the same application or module running concurrently, which adds flexibility. This means developers don’t have to worry as much about version conflicts because Erlang handles it natively through its runtime system.
Version Isolation: Different versions of BEAM files can coexist in the system, allowing easier upgrades and rollbacks.
6. Distribution and Updates
Managing the distribution of pure BEAM files can be simplified by using OTP releases and tools like exrm or Distillery (which have Elixir roots but are compatible with Erlang). These tools allow developers to bundle the application into a single directory structure that contains everything needed to run, making it easy to distribute or update the app on the PinePhone.
Minimal Manual Intervention: You only need to copy the release files over to the device and run them, minimizing the need for complex package management tools.
7. Drawbacks
While this system has its advantages, there are a few caveats:
Manual BEAM Installation: You’d need to ensure the Erlang runtime (BEAM) is correctly installed on the PinePhone, which can be more involved than managing BEAM files themselves.
Lack of Graphical Tools: Compared to traditional package managers, the ecosystem for managing pure BEAM files may lack graphical or user-friendly interfaces, relying more on command-line tools like Rebar3.
Conclusion
With pure BEAM files, package management can be quite straightforward, focusing on the OTP release system, Rebar3 for dependencies, and BEAM's platform-independent design. You'd bypass many issues typical of traditional package managers, especially when you don’t need to handle native code. This approach leverages Erlang’s strengths in portability, version isolation, and distributed updates, which makes it well-suited for a mobile ecosystem like the PinePhone.