Intense replications of art, perfect, readable, an instant present of the human impulse set out without any work or endeavour, now raises discussions on the nature of the phenomenon. But scientism cannot answer the call or tell us what art is, nor will it tell us its purpose or benefit - the philosopher is the only one who remains outside of this paradigm and cannot fundamentally be replaced by any AI

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

And is also the one who can see that AI will be a far greater disappointment in terms of radical transformation than people think.