If the technical/rational ones are being paid then should they still be considered the only valid ones?
I’m not saying core is bought and paid for. But unless we know 100% that they are not then why would we think they’re the only ones with valid opinions?
do you have any idea of the people who work on bitcoin? I have met lots of them in person and have talked to them at length. I suggest get to know them before you slander them and me.
No slander intended, just making a point. Same as how “trusting the science” may be questionable due to incentives. So it’s worth asking questions, imo.
Ultimately, I’m just not hearing about the benefits that come from the size limit. Why isn’t that being discussed? Can you speak to the benefits? Instead of benefits all I’m hearing is: It’s worthless to resist or trust the professionals. I just want to know the benefits since I’m usually on the side of progress.
*size limit increase
