Replying to Avatar <old>cypherhoodlum

I'm not sure that's the best way to go either if the train of thought is: "this new feature breaks a lot of other clients, oh well, let's just make it opt-in, then it's fine."
69
Account deleted 2y ago

I agree with you. I stil think it has value in beta/test flight for users who understand that they are testing, quite a lot of us here now. But, should never happen with stuff the « common » pleb uses. The reason I mentioned opt in was because of how OnlyZap was rolled out, which caused discussion, but was really only an option for people running the builds from TestFlight.

I don’t like what I am seeing with passive aggressive notes posted by devs. Ego has no room in here. Then, the technical aspects are well past my pay grade…

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
<old>cypherhoodlum 2y ago

True, onlyzaps was a perfect opt-in feature. Yeah, I guess all disruptive features like that should be opt-in. And I mean disruptive in the sense that it breaks the patterns of legacy social media.