Does it seem normal for a candidate who has extensively examined the pharmaceutical industry in relation to vaccines, Covid, and related issues for more than a decade to have nothing at all to say about pharma and transgenderism?

I can’t quite get over it. I’m talking about RFK, Jr., of course. I know he said we could have sports, but he also said he supports “LGBQT” and he refused to speak with Moms for Liberty, seemingly for this reason. In fact, he seems almost clueless about the whole issue.

Is it really possible to be clueless having spent this long looking at the problems with Big Pharma?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Your Democrat party pushes the ideology, so why is it a surprise?

RFK is a nihilism candidate. Every now and then they pop up to challenge “the orthodoxy” which needs to be challenged, but no one takes them seriously.

It’s a shame because we need a serious challenger right now, but then again, the guy who wants to be king is currently likely the other nominee, so no one but a nihilist candidate will try.