I don't this is what he's complaining about though. But one definitely can some LLM content pushers trying to farm sats here and it's fucking annoying. Don't think anyone would mind some LLM assisted writing, as long as it still reads lime coming from a real human.
Discussion
You get it.
Let's make a test. Which one is better?
Like with anything too much is always bad. And of course automated content and responses are annoying and useless. I was talking about using it to crate a better vehicle to relay my ides, opinions and thinking to people in an easy way. BTW will you join us for #eurocorn in about 20 minutes? There is nothing more authentic than a live chat. :-)
-----
Like with anything, too much is always bad. And yes, automated posts and responses are definitely annoying and useless. I'm actually talking more about using LLMs to better communicate my own thoughts, opinions, and ideas clearly to other people.
BTW, will you join us for #eurocorn in about 20 minutes? There's nothing more authentic than a live chat! :-)
The latter is most likely AI-assisted. The first has a typo so I’d be surprised if that wasn’t written by a human. The 2nd has better reading flow imho but I prefer some phrases of the human text (like “vehicle to relay my ideas”) but that might just be me.
Yes, the first was fed into the model and the second is the output. I liked the vehicle to relay ideas as well, and if it wouldn't be a test I would put it back there. :-)