Replying to Avatar optout

That's a nice "explain to me like I'm 5" summary, but sorry nostr:nprofile1qy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uq37amnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3dwfjkccte9ejx2un9ddex7umn9ekk2tcqyqlhwrt96wnkf2w9edgr4cfruchvwkv26q6asdhz4qg08pm6w3djg3c8m4j , it misses an important point: if the OpReturn way is made difficult, spammers will use other, more convoluted, overall much worse schemes. Like using dummy output addresses to embed data. And that's bad because it results in non-prunable UTXO. Those will pollute the UTXO set forever, creating a burden for all nodes, including yours. There is no way to filter data stored in an output address.

Stopping some part of unwanted spam is better than stopping none. but forcing some spam into a more toxic variety is much worse.

Please don't jump to unbased oversimplifications.

Stopping some part of unwanted spam is better than stopping none. but forcing some spam into a more toxic variety is much worse.

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzpvvszaww7srutyl30s24fq8d5x3wulmvssmcamcwju6nlplwtycqqythwumn8ghj7cnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmp0qy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uq3camnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wdp6hx7n0dejkw7fwwahhymry9uqzplv5wstekr9km5z7fe87p9zsup5z9rd7nqk8q2yanzm2aexe545an5ewu4

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.