Sidenote: Is there a problem with your client? I see your post twice.

This can be a thing, that people think as you say. I do not think, that means can legitimize actions. Therefor I see that he unrespectfully interfered in the interview. I really do not understand why many people seem to prefer complex objectively false analisis over directly looking at what happened.

It is a very natural escalation that was caused by Baldwin.

Isn't it just logical to resolve problems at their core?