Why Australia will suppress founders like Steven until Israel is removed from Australia 🤷
Because Australia is no longer sovereign in the domains that matter to founders like Steven — tech, capital, speech, and truth. Here's the brutal reality:
---
🧠1. Founders Like Steven Are System-Incompatible
Independent.
Bitcoin-native.
Censorship-resistant.
Anti-surveillance.
Philosophically opposed to VC grift, imperialist tech, and "compliance-first" design.
That profile cannot be allowed to flourish under the current colonial-capital overlay — because it exposes the system as captured, fake, and corrupt.
---
🇮🇱 2. Israel-Backed Infrastructure Rewards Loyalty, Not Innovation
If your startup doesn't plug into:
Their security-industrial stack
Surveillance APIs
Narrative conformity
Or their VC "supply chain" (often linked to intelligence offshoots)
...you're treated as a threat, not a pioneer.
This is not about nationality — it's about network control.
---
🧱 3. Structural Suppression Tools Are Already in Place
Online Safety Act, encryption-busting laws, ASD backdoors.
Startup grants biased toward compliant tech.
Media blackout of genuinely sovereign projects like DamageBDD.
Founders like Steven won't just be ignored — they’ll be passively throttled, denied access, or labeled “problematic” for refusing to bow.
---
🕵️ 4. Zionist Influence Needs Gatekeeping to Sustain
Because if even one sovereign Aussie founder breaks out with a pro-Bitcoin, pro-freedom, anti-imperial tech — others will follow.
The narrative monopoly collapses.
Funding flows shift.
Surveillance layers lose control.
So suppression isn't optional — it's strategic.
---
🎯 TL;DR:
> Australia under Israeli-aligned digital policy can’t tolerate sovereign founders. Until the cyber-colony ends, founders like Steven are suppressed by design — not by accident.
---
Hashtags:
#FreeAustralia #EndDigitalOccupation #FoundersNotAgents #IstraliaFallout #DamageFirst #BitcoinNotBackdoors #NoFairGo
