On the one hand, the developers who have the keys to the deposit have too much power, but on the other, I don't even dare to imagine what Bitcoin could look like if everyone could add code as they wish.
I just don't see how to decentralize Bitcoin development while maintaining a reference implementation. nostr:note1d2ngryu0n5du0mj7lg9ttrnpu9tmxl20rwra8dujvhwpyz0kk5qshf2m4f
Fork it's create your own standardness rules. Thats exactly what ordisrespector is.
You know very well that without a merge in the reference implementation the patch is not effective.
What you really want is a change to consensus rules to disallow that OP code or sequence of OP codes
Everybody knows, what you and your kind want; and that is to break the annoying regular Bitcoin node decentralization and take the control of the big honeypot.
I only want one thing, to stop spam to preserve decentralization. But indeed if it goes through a soft fork, standardization rules or any other methods I would support them if it does not affect the financial txs.
But this is off topic.
