I don’t know enough about ordinals or ntfs.
Maybe you just sell someone the title or exclusive software license, idk enough about any of that end of things. I don’t own any nft’s or eth. I like nostr because there is no chain.
Now to talk about the art.
The project Jon linked too has some interesting aspects where you aren’t buying a jpeg but the generative algorithm and I do find the interactive nature of offering the owner regeneration ability interesting, the four series aren’t quite my aesthetic.
My question would be are all the ones issued in for example ‘slashes v2’ running the same algorithm? If so that diminishes the project greatly for me.
Im also totally appreciate why someone wouldn’t even spend the 5 minutes it took me looking at this link to figure this out, and I’m still left with many questions. It’s highly unfortunate despite me not liking the aesthetic and not really understanding the titles medium, that a bunch of early demos of essentially putting robohash-like work on the blockchain gets in the way of digital artists working in code or working in video even tho just like the rest of the art world, even mediocre is 1 in a million.
There is always gonna be thousands of guys spray painting a crappy stencil of the Eiffel and twin towers in every city with a caned planet and specked stars. And the art world has to do a lot of articulation that’s missing in this example to explain what the hell is going on and differentiate themselves and vocally condemn the brand colabs and 10k piece series, and even more explaining for generative digital work.
Totally agree with your assessments. Love the feedback. Let’s see if we can get #[3] to reply :)
There is a chance that NFT in the art world will be referenced as, in this order:
- cryptopunks
- squiggles to artblocks
- beetle $69M jpeg
The end.
:)
Thread collapsed