Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance
Really helped me sort out my own thinking on the fact/value distinction. Hume was right, you can't get an ought from an is. You can however get an is from an ought.
Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance
Really helped me sort out my own thinking on the fact/value distinction. Hume was right, you can't get an ought from an is. You can however get an is from an ought.
Have you read Lila too?
I started it, but it wasn't the right time and I had a hard time picking it up consistently. I'll get back to it soon. Got a bit of a synopsis?
I'd say his main thesis in the book is that value is fundamental, as in "electrons value positive charges, which is why they move towards them."
Hard to give a synopsis, though. It's not a simple book.
I get it, complexity is hard to convey with little time and mere words in text form to work with. But thanks, I think I've come to a similar conclusion in my own thinking, aided by his first book, Zen.
My take on it is that value is objective, but context-dependant. My main goal is to reconcile two strong intuitions:
1. There can be individual variation with respect to what ought to be valued and how
And
2. We can be more or less correct in our valuations
It's a difficult nut to crack, but I think it has helped me so much to think of value this way.
Looking forward to Lila.