In your opinion.
Your opinion doesn't matter. You know the only person whose opinion really matters in this case?
The agents that were there.
Wanna know why?
It's up to their discretion.
You just don't like that. And that's fine. But it doesn't change anything.
Also I really like the cherry picking you did to make your point as if your entire argument wasn't also made moot by this-
"Impeding surveillance:
Purposeful acts that materially disrupt or expose lawful law enforcement monitoring activities.
Impeding pursuit:
Conduct that physically or practically prevents officers from lawfully chasing or apprehending a suspect."
This combined with officer discretion pretty much just ends this entire debate.
Those agents clearly believed that she and her wife were preventing one or both of those things and they needed to be removed from the equation. They were told to exit the vehicle. They didn't. At which point they attempted to flee after committing what was then criminal impeding/obstruction.
It's just completely pointless to talk about any of this because you're going to see what you want to.
