Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar Rusty Russell

It wouldn't have attracted the hard money maximalists, and the early marketing would have suffered. (Remember the one in a million club?). But bag holders generally use rationality to justify their beliefs, not the other way around, so I don't expect much would have changed.

And economically we wouldn't see any difference yet. We would avoid another economic transition: Bitcoin would be "done".

Long term, the difference is significant, so I would never advocate for it now: that would be a rug pull.

Avatar
Peter Todd 1y ago

The hard money maximalists were just fine with gold, which has no supply cap.

If Bitcoin has been 1₿/block forever, the sound money people would have just said it's digital gold, and the issuance schedule emulates mining forever.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.