Well, What Do You Know? Plato’s Theaetetus

From Counter Currents

3,213 words “What do I know?” asked French thinker Michel de Montaigne in the 16th century. Two hundred years later, the German philosopher Immanuel Kant refined the question, asking rather, “What can I know?”. In philosophy, however, there is rarely anything new under the sun, and this was not a new query. Both Montaigne’s and […]

Jul 29th 2025 7:00am EDT

Source Link: https://counter-currents.com/2025/07/well-what-do-you-know-platos-theaetetus/

Share, promote & comment with Nostr: https://dissentwatch.com/boost/?boost_post_id=1011884

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I asked ChatGPT...

Philosophical question: What can I know?

Here's the response:

That question—**"What can I know?"**—is one of the most fundamental in philosophy. It's at the heart of **epistemology**, the study of knowledge. Let’s explore it from a few key philosophical angles:

---

### 1. **Descartes and Radical Doubt**

René Descartes began his search for certainty by doubting everything he could:

> "I think, therefore I am" (*Cogito, ergo sum*)

He concluded that the only thing he could not doubt was **his own existence as a thinking being**. Everything else—sensory experiences, external reality, even mathematics—could be called into question.

So from this view, you can know:

* That you are **thinking**

* That **you exist** (at least as a mind)

---

### 2. **Empiricism (Locke, Hume, etc.)**

Empiricists argue that knowledge comes from **sense experience**. You know things because you perceive them through your senses.

But this leads to skepticism about:

* Whether your senses **reliably** reflect reality

* Whether there's anything **beyond your perceptions**

So, empirically, you can know:

* Your **experiences**

* Maybe some regularities in those experiences (e.g., fire is hot)

---

### 3. **Kant’s Synthesis**

Immanuel Kant tried to bridge rationalism and empiricism. He argued:

* We never know things **in themselves** (*noumena*)

* We only know things **as they appear to us** (*phenomena*), structured by our minds

So what can you know?

* The **structure of experience** (space, time, causality)

* Not reality in itself, but how it appears **to human minds**

---

### 4. **Contemporary Epistemology**

Modern philosophers often break down knowledge as:

> **Justified True Belief (JTB)** — though this was challenged by the **Gettier problem**

Now, knowledge is seen as:

* **Belief**

* That is **true**

* And **justified** (in some defensible way)

* Possibly requiring **no luck** or **reliable formation**

So: You can know what’s **justifiably believed and true**—but drawing the line is tricky.

---

### 5. **Pragmatism (James, Dewey, Rorty)**

Knowledge is what **works**—what helps you navigate the world effectively. It doesn't require certainty.

So you know:

* What is **useful** in practice

* What’s **coherent** with the rest of what you believe

---

### Summary: *What Can You Know?*

* **You exist** (as a thinker)

* **You experience** things

* Some beliefs may be **justified and true**

* But many things remain **uncertain**, and **context**, **coherence**, or **pragmatic usefulness** might matter more than absolute certainty.