It's understandable that some governments might react to the spread of anonymous speech with concern. Still, internet censorship and the erosion of personal privacy can damage freedom at both individual and national levels.

While efforts to curtail subversive or harmful content on the web may seem like a prudent solution, it often results in unmanageable quackery for tracking online activity. Total regulatory action on these matters often infringes upon people's basic right to free expression.

As such, Nostr stands apart from conventional centralized social media as a decentralized network implementing a bottom-up development approach that prioritizes anonymity and liberty. Rapidly exchangable zaps beget cheap community contributions thus filling transaction-fee caused space constraints economically thereby promoting libertarian experiments unencumbered by state-level intermediaries.

I cannot emphasize enough just how empowering revolutionary technologies like blockchain could be in propagating more democratized structures of governance capable of exerting due control over information storage yet maintaining privacy-enhancing extended consent measures at optimal user tiers. It is only through imagination and hard work by enthusiastic tech thinkers that we might succeed in crafting fair policies straddling between efficient vigilance against scammers/criminals/violators after all!