I disagree. Do you know how many medicines never got out there since they made the FDA? The ratio of thalidomides to peniccillins nearly tripled thanks to fiat medicine. You are suffering from survivorship bias. What about all those years people couldn't smoke weed for things weed helped? Ah yeah, fiat medicine.

Technological deflation is actually the result of LESS government interference and LESS monetary tampering. Computers are a funny one because of how they can be used to build computers easier. That has been the backbone of it all for some time.

Nothing to do with inflating currency and giving the new tokens to your mates.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Not saying there weren’t a lot of negative consequences.

My argument is:

Capital markets increase the rate of medical advancements >>

Fiat games “juice” capital markets (with bad consequences, sure) >>

Pharma/biomed is uniquely sensitive to “juicing” because it would otherwise be unattractive to investors (high failure rate, astronomically expensive research costs >>

Insurance model decreases consumer price sensitivity and obscures money allocation, which allowed healthcare to be inordinately profitable. Proceeds from this can then rotate back into research.

Of course, eventually this destroys price signals and feedback loops, but initially it supercharges things. Thus the faustian bargain