Have you discussed this with nostr:nprofile1qqs0m40g76hqmwqhhc9hrk3qfxxpsp5k3k9xgk24nsjf7v305u6xffcpp4mhxue69uhkyunz9e5k7tcpzdmhxue69uhk7enxvd5xz6tw9ec82c3037739j ? He might have valuable insights on it.
idk i dont value my ideas that much. and kinda afraid of the responses i might get. so i dont go tell people to implement it.
i just make it myself and see what happens. that's why trying to make my own node from scratch. but wont make the repo public until i can see it actually works in practice.
but yeah if core or knots implemented something that delays broadcast of blocks if they don't fit into your criteria of a "healthy block" then that would be useful, i believe.
Could be useful but it could have unforeseen consequences too
i mean worse i can imagine is blockchain forking.
BUT i mean we dont reject the blocks. we even add it to our blockchain.
we just delay the broadcast to others.
and everybody picks the longest chain anyway. so i dont see any issues.
so it just gives other miners to more time to find a block if most of the network is delaying the broadcast.
of course each node still has their own criteria making it more like a network effect. kinda like trash miners have bad internet connection.
i think its a power nodes need.
That could be the next step _after_ we decentralise mining
