Not buying it. What’s the point? Is there any doubt that it would be at least this destructive? I’d say Hiroshima and Nagasaki were proof enough. And that part about the car is lame. It’s called film exposure. You seriously trying to make me believe with this TikTok bullshit that the car just appears? Ugh
Nuclear test footage definitely wasn’t faked and of course, nor was the moon landing 🍿 https://v.nostr.build/P7iCFADGbcfIYAoM.mp4
Discussion
The car appearing is in the original footage that Andreessen and Rogan are watching in studio, it’s not added by the TikTok edit.
If the footage is real, how did the camera stay not only standing at these elevated points but even steady, whilst the house gets blown away?
And why didn’t the radiation destroy the film?
Not sure exactly which shot you're referring to, but here are some explanations:
Camera stable because strong tele lens, many kms away.
Radiation can be dealt with by covering camera housing with lead. Radiation isn't reflected like light, so you only need to cover in direction of the source.
Never underestimate the 195x/196x engineering.