I disagree with this comparison, but deeply appreciate the effort that went into writing such a well thought position.

My bone with the comparison is that both quarters have equal immediate spendability. Bitcoin and cash do not. If I am faced with the choice of spending cash or BTC, then it is very likely going to *have* to be cash, because the spendability of BTC is very low. At best, I’m going to have to rapidly liquidate BTC into cash in order to spend it.

This strikes at one of the original conversations about money: you can’t eat it. Its value depends not upon being spent, but upon its spendability. $1 is worth a potato only because I can go to Walmart and exchange $1 for an actual potato.

I cannot do that with BTC. I believe the day I *can* and without converting it (at a loss usually) to another currency, the value of BTC goes up. Demand is half of the value equation, and spendability is demand in currency.

Silver coin can be converted back to fiat (also at a loss) which makes it better than modern quarter.

If I’m starving to death and need 50 cents *right now* to keep from starving - silver coin does that too, which is why as a medium of trade, silver coin still beats BTC.

Just an opinion. 🤷‍♂️

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.