Could depend on which definition of abstract you consider also.

Either something existing “in thought” but no real physical or concrete existence (which we obviously know as wrong, and what Parker is considering as Elons “representation”.

OR to extract or remove, and consider something theoretically or separately from something else. I could see it meaning, as an “abstract representation” meaning you are separating out and considering the actual VALUE of whatever the real thing is. The money is representing the value of the real thing. I could see it working in that way, if thats what he meant. Under the second definition and not the first, which is the way it seems nostr:npub1w69ya7xs697hk3hky3gllryz8rwverfa0ylz89chf9qnhfcskc2s64zltw is taking it, right?

Not an Elon apologist! Not a big fan of him! Just something i was considering. Thought experiment 🤷‍♂️😅