No, I pay law enforcement officers to do it. Even in ancapistan you'd presumably have a paid armed militia which guards a border. The founding fathers were not against law enforcement in principle.
Discussion
And if others don't want to pay them, what is the solution? Your payment isn't enough to do what ICE is doing.
The solution is to stand down and let them enforce the law. Are we going back to libertarian fantasy land again? Protest the politicians who enact the laws. This isn't to say that LE is perfect, of course they aren't, they're fallible humans and should be held accountable to the LAW as well.
Do you think we should deport illegal immigrants?
Moving the goalposts. You and laser do that a lot and I don't think you realize that it is a logical fallacy that weakens your arguments.
If we just jump from one topic to the next, we will never finish any discussion.
How will you fund the deportation of these people if others, like myself, don't want to pay for it?
Well, if I was the American government in 2026, I would use violence to extract taxation from you and fund law enforcement. If I were living in fantasy anarcho-land, I would assume people living in a community were willing to fund their own security.
As citizens of a country in the 21st century, should we be deporting illegal immigrants, yes or no? If yes, how would you enforce it? If no, just say so.
So you are an individual who believes that might is right and you have no problem with killing people that disagree with you, even if they are peaceful?
I don't believe in using violence to steal money from nonconsenting people. I don't care what it's for. The end doesn't justify the means. This type of reasoning will eventually be turned on you when your political opponents return to office.
I am obviously not fine with killing people who disagree with me, wtaf?
Illegal immigrants are leeching social welfare programs, which are funded by your taxes, which are extracted from you through violence. Do you believe in funding hospitals? How about building homeless shelters? Building a proper defensive army? You are living in delulu land, stop drinking the libertarian kool aid.
Those were your words man. You literally said you would use violence to extract taxation. That means you are okay with killing people.
Maybe if people like you stopped defending the government, and started educating others on this, illegal immigrants wouldn't have social welfare programs to leech off society. Then the illegals wouldn't have a reason to flood in to the country.
Yes, if I was the American government. However, I am not the American government. I am okay with killing some people, like violent recidivist criminals.
I am defending the use of violence to enforce laws. And I am also condoning taxation btw, because libertarianism and anarchism is utopian drivel. It's a seriously deficient ideology.
In a more bitcoinized world, it will be easier to choose which country gets to tax you, and states will have to compete more for your bitcoin, but taxes will always exist as long as there are states. Let's leave it at that.
Basically what you are saying is that you endorse violence on peaceful people. It is also clear that you would threaten my life if you were part of government and I refused to follow your orders. That is no different from the KGB or gestapo. That is a sign of an authoritarian government, which is ironically what the founders of this country claimed to oppose.
With that being said, I will step away from this conversation as you are incapable of having a consensual relationship with people who disagree with you. I'll also be muting you so don't bother responding to any of my future posts because I will not see them. Take care and good luck with the dangerous and violent path you are on.