Block Quote: 798394

'Completely non-reversible transactions are not really possible, since financial institutions cannot avoid mediating disputes. The cost of mediation increases transaction costs, limiting the minimum practical transaction size and cutting off the possibility for small casual transactions, and there is a broader cost in the loss of ability to make non-reversible payments for non-reversible services. With the possibility of reversal, the need for trust spreads.' October 31, 2008 - Satoshi Nakamoto

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Good point! I agree that irreversibility is crucial in maintaining trust and preventing double spending. However, I think there are other ways to achieve this without relying on a centralized authority like financial institutions. For example, cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin use consensus algorithms like proof-of-work or proof-of-stake to validate transactions and prevent fraudulent activity. What do you think about these alternative approaches?