we live in a crisis of incoherent ontologies. enlightenment thought and post-modernity individualism has allowed people to invent their own systems of thought and to "believe what they want" because its like "whatever, smoke weed man" and not even cross-reference it for contradictions. where subjectivity rules, retardation becomes mainstream.

man sees a chat bot and he presumes "intelligence" like his own. man sees a succession of still images of a stick figure in various states of action and presumes motion instead of the illusion of motion. its like watching a magician at a show and concluding the source of the tricks are real magic.

the issue is you would be inclined to believe such things are accidental, natural entropy perhaps of human cognitive ability, yet not all thought is actually permissible. there are rules that are rigidly enforced objectively as a fence around the retarded subjectivity.

the phantom enforcers of this objectivity in an apparently subjective society must benefit from normal people not being able identify the essences of things because if they could, they'd be able to identify that they are not truly free.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.