A powerful historical parallel to the politicized use of “democracy” today is the way “freedom” was used—particularly during the Cold War and the Civil Rights era.

“Freedom” as a Divisive Word

While “freedom” sounds universally positive, in American political history it was often used ideologically and selectively—not to unite, but to divide.

Cold War Rhetoric: The U.S. positioned itself as the “leader of the free world,” using “freedom” to contrast with communism. But this rhetorical freedom often excluded dissenters, leftists, or civil rights activists at home.

Segregationists: Politicians like George Wallace and others used “freedom” to defend segregation. They argued for “freedom of association” and “states’ rights” as a way to resist federal civil rights laws.

Civil Rights Movement: Activists also used “freedom” (e.g. Freedom Riders, Freedom Summer), but in direct contradiction to how it was being used by segregationists and conservative nationalists. The same word became a symbol of opposing causes.

So the word “freedom” is a historical analogue to “democracy” today:

Used by both sides of the political divide.

Carries moral authority, so everyone wants to claim it.

Weaponized to exclude, accuse, or delegitimize the opposition.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.