If there is a metric within Web-of-Trust that can be calculated by apps, it should be surfaced and normalized.

cc nostr:nprofile1qqs9xtvrphl7p8qnua0gk9zusft33lqjkqqr7cwkr6g8wusu0lle8jcpzamhxue69uhkummnw3ezuurpwfjhgmeww3hhwmsprpmhxue69uhhqun9d45h2mfwwpexjmtpdshxuet5cfkclk

nostr:nevent1qqs897qv85unk87xkpm65vezr20rxznac772ml360m2kws0efqg94pgpr9mhxue69uhhq7tjv9kkjepwve5kzar2v9nzucm0d5pzq0mhp4ja8fmy48zuk5p6uy37vtk8tx9dqdwcxm32sy8nsaa8gkeyqvzqqqqqqy30va7a

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Not sure. Suggestions on what you would do? Some sort of a score?

I'm not sure either. Would have to evaluate the type of data Web of Trust allows for.

I think a score based on a weighted average of explicitly followed high-trust relays would be a solid start. It moves beyond passive followership and measures active, decentralized curation.

WoT Score = \sum (\text{Trust Level} \times \text{Relay Quality})

This metric could tell you not just how many people follow you, but how many trusted communities have vouched for you.

Coracle does a good job of it last I checked but it’s been a while. Also the dev is a based Christian dad from Idaho

coracle