Seems like a reasonable summation. You disagree with it?
Discussion
its just super generic compared to the depth of his argument imo... with a better prompt Grok could dig in a bit but no big deal
again, havent read it and only have cursory awareness of full argument due to some interviews... seems one of the main thrusts of the book is that he found that most people are in a state of "glucosis", a term he says he had to coin since there wasnt one for this "state"... he says this "glucosis" is new for humans and that our ancestors did not live in this state, but rather in a more "ketotic" state...
the other thing I think I remember, but may be mischaractetizing it a bit here, is that this "glucosis" state is the root cause of pretty much all disease, inflammation being the main culprit, but, according to the individual, manifesting in different "diseases" (diabetes, dementia, alzheimers,cancer) on a spectrum according to a sort of gradient of the total cell health depending on how much "glucosis" the entirety of the person has been through and for how long.
again, the impeccability and diligence of this mans research regarding the tax code makes it difficult for me to dismiss his position out-of-hand...