Solar energy, while often marketed as a clean alternative, is still highly costly due to its dependence on expensive manufacturing processes and raw materials. Producing solar panels requires significant energy input, often derived from fossil fuels, including coal and natural gas, which undermines the environmental benefits. The need for carbon-intensive resources in the production and transportation of solar technology makes it less “green” than many assume.

In addition to the high upfront costs, solar energy also faces challenges in efficiency and storage. The production of solar panels and the batteries needed for energy storage relies heavily on materials like lithium and cobalt, which have environmental and social costs. Despite being a renewable source of energy, solar’s reliance on carbon-based resources and high production costs makes it a complex and costly solution compared to hydrocarbons, which have a more developed and cost-efficient infrastructure.

#siamstr #btc #bitcoin #nostr #asknostr

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Yes, things can be improved, but for hydrocarbons you need hyrdogen and how are we going to produce thát you suppose?

electrolysis (splitting water with electricity), steam methane reforming (SMR) but I think that if we have the free market we can focus on more innovating cleaner alternatives to SMR.