I'll always agree execution matters more than the idea. No arguments there. I think we also agree that at the end of the day, the relay operator (and client to some extent) can always accept or deny whatever content they choose.

I think what I'm trying to get at is: classification does not mean censorship. None of the NIPs related to reporting (self or otherwise) suggest relays or clients should act one way or the other. So that's why I don't see what all the fuss is about.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Did you know that TikTok and Facebook and all those companies literally train their (mostly offshore) moderators and staff - with a classification list of content to target? Often people who don’t speak the language of the source content are ‘moderating’ it.

It’s the first step toward “regulation” made easy. For censorship resistance properties, it should be made impossible or extremely costly.

There is literally a context code proposed for “Political Protest”. Most countries have biased media, but many have extremely government controlled media. Nostr is a tool to allow real humans, and not ministry of truth, to communicate freely. The number of political elections that have media censorship and worse…

The current proposed NIP is actually related to a business they are starting. It has little to do with the wider community benefiting from it - it’s how they seek to make money and moderate their business.

I’m just glad it won’t work anyway. People just need to be aware powers without the same freedom of communication mindset will at some point attempt to try to censor Nostr.