Replying to Avatar Aaron van Wirdum

“The Core30 side” has pretty consistently said that if you really want to stop big OP_RETURNs (or whatever else may be considered “spam”), the conversation should focus on the consensus layer, yes.

But the “Bitcoin Knots side” seems to finally be catching on to this.

But “the Core30 side” has also pretty consistently said that no one has to upgrade if they don’t want to. To pretend otherwise is just being disingenuous.
Avatar
RamenCoffee 2mo ago 💬 1

That part of "no one has to upgrade" is willful blindness. If they were for free choice they wouldn't have removed the option to change opreturn limit.

There will come a version that will make people upgrade for either a feature or a cve. They plan on it. That's why knots support is paramount.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Aaron van Wirdum 2mo ago

They didn’t remove that option…

Avatar
Scrotus 2mo ago 💬 2

Ironic

Avatar
Aaron van Wirdum 2mo ago 💬 1

Avatar
BitcoinIsFuture 2mo ago 💬 3

Lopp the shitcoiner told you that defaults matter.

Of course you miss that fact.

Avatar
Scrotus 2mo ago 💬 1

Keep going, almost there!

f0
ohvdjud 2mo ago

But isn't this actually not true? Because the underlying feature was also changed. 83 on v29 isn't the same as 83 on v30.

Avatar
Scrotus 2mo ago 💬 1

he in his bag

Avatar
BitcoinIsFuture 2mo ago

They are for brainless shitcoiners like you to be exploited by evil shitcoiners like Lopp.

f0
ohvdjud 2mo ago

But isn't this actually not true? Because the underlying feature was also changed. 83 on v29 isn't the same as 83 on v30.