But you still can't proof that I am actually moving in that example and not everything else (including the air and so on).
My point was, that it is irrelevant who moves.
So is with earth and sun. Which one really moves or if both move doesn't matter.
Earth circling the sun is just the easiest way to draw it in a model.
In your example, what is the more logical conclusion that could be drawn - that once you jump off of a building, you move towards the ground, or that the whole world and air moves up towards you?
You're venturing into a completely theoretical discussion in order to obfuscate the point being made.
To my point, it does matter, because the whole basis of the majority beliefs is based on the idea that the Earth is moving, when there is no objective evidence for that being the case. It's exactly why relativity what invented; it's a completely theoretical concept that pushes reality into the imaginations of people.
Look, maybe you got me wrong.
I am not opposed to your claim, I must stated like "ok, we can't prove if earth moves or sun or both, nobody proved a fix point somewhere till today."
Now my question was: why does it matter? What changes if something is fix? Fix to WHAT? The anchor of the universe?
I just want to know what your point is - there has to be some conclusion.
I mean, you don't post obvious things without some conclusion or something?
I am not here to try to prove your claim wrong (because it's not wrong), I want to know what's so special about it? why does it matter?
Or do I just miss the point? (English it's not my native language, after all)
