It's not the role of the military to do local law enforcement, because of the training, technology, and roles regarding civil liberties.
Now if the local politicians are negligent to the point that it's the only way to enforce basic law, then this is less about the military vs police, and more-so about who can order which. In that case, I'd agree with you.
However, given the evidence that I've seen on this specific case, I am not convinced it was justified.
That seems much more rational than a TDS take on the situation. And I admit to not viewing evidence in this specific case.
While most TDS stricken liberals snap to “Trump did a thing, here’s why it’s wrong “, after his first term I’m much more inclined to let him cook.
If the supreme court eventually says it was illegal then I’ll be inclined to agree with you.
And also, if it’s not adjudicated as illegal, then your opinion of the legal interpretation doesn’t really matter.
