Umm...!
Value-based and transparent algorithms prioritize the user’s interests and intentions over platform or advertiser agendas.
Some will, but not all. It depends on how the trade-off is presented.
If ads = free access: Many users are already accustomed to this exchange. If the ads are respectful, optional, and well-disclosed, some users will accept them.
If ad-free options exist: Given a clear, affordable alternative (e.g. micro-subscriptions, freemium models, or donation-based access), many users will opt out of ads.
The differentiator is control: People are more likely to accept ads if they choose to rather than having them injected by opaque systems.
Not at scale not yet. But this is where things get interesting.
What creators want: Ownership, distribution reach, audience connection, and monetization. Nostr nails the first two better than anyone true sovereignty over identity and distribution.
What it lacks: Scalable monetization that competes with YouTube ad revenue or Substack subscriptions yet.
Zaps (Lightning payments) and other peer-to-peer tools offer powerful proof-of-concept for fan-powered revenue.
Open-source composability means developers can build monetization tools without gatekeepers.
As creators get burned by traditional platforms (see: demonetization, shadowbanning, revenue cuts), the appeal of platform independence grows.
So, creators will come especially early adopters, niche communities, and those burned by Web2. But for the masses, Nostr (or any open protocol) needs!!!
These are my best answers.
I have a headache now, Sir ✌️😵💫